TORONTO3 (Reuters) - The old adage “You are what you eat” may soon become “You are what you need to eat.”
Thanks to studies that have mapped humans’ genetic makeup - which can outline illnesses we are prone to - we could, in theory at least, change our diets to include foods that combat those ailments, a Canadian study shows.
“In the future, we may choose a breakfast cereal based on our genes,” said Dr. Peter Singer, director of the Joint Centre for Bioethics at the University of Toronto.
“It is hypothetical, but possible, that if you have a particular gene you eat honey nut cereal to reduce your chance of heart disease, or, if you have another gene, you take the raisin bran to cut your chance of prostate cancer.”
But the benefits of dining your way to genetic health -- the science of nutritional genomics, or nutrigenomics -- also come with a downside, the study cautions.
Scientists warn of the dangers of collecting and storing personal genetic information, adding that nutritional genomics is in its infancy, with no evidence yet that it will be successful on a mass scale.
Since researchers mapped the human genome, or book of life, in 2001, they, along with business, have been intrigued by the idea of creating customized diet plans based on genetic roadmaps.
The Centre for Bioethics and the University of Guelph in Ontario led the study on the ethical questions surrounding genes and nutrition.
The report does not prescribe guidelines but highlights concerns, such as privacy, confidentiality, misuse of information, discrimination based on genetic makeup and fears that employers and insurers could use genetic information to unfair advantage.
The study, which also included scientists from the United States and England, will be presented at the second annual International Nutrigenomics Conference in Amsterdam this week.
A few U.S., British and Canadian firms already offer tests to determine genetic risk profiles. Vancouver, British Columbia-based Internet site onepersongenetics.com, for example, advertises a $379 test.
“There is a general question of how strong the science actually is and how reliable are the claims (that) can be made about whether genetic tests and modification of diet will improve health,” said Dr. David Castle, assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Guelph.
Nutrigenomics, unlike genetic engineering, does not involve altering foods but changing diets based on genetic makeup.
Researchers said that many government health agencies have advised citizens to eat right according to various food pyramids and charts since the mid-1900s and these plans are still the best available. But they added that nutrigenomics, if it can be applied on a mass scale, would be better because each person would have a customized plan.
Basing diets on genetic makeup can be beneficial, said Dr. Abdallah Daar, also with the University of Toronto’s Joint Centre for Bioethics, because dietary patterns are linked to several of the top 10 causes of illness and death in North America, including heart disease, stroke, many types of cancer and adult-onset diabetes.
Daar, who is director of the program in applied ethics and biotechnology at the center, said the new science is complicated as more than one gene plays a role the development of some diseases and one gene can be involved in causing many diseases.
Even though the mass application of nutrigenomics may still be decades away, Daar said its advance is “outstripping the public’s ability to make informed choices about what kind of regulations should be introduced to address ethical and privacy concerns.”
Copyright © 2002 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.