Danish scientists evaluated 2,816 men and women ages 35 to 65 who were free of heart disease, stroke, and cancer when they joined the study in the late ’80s. Each participant provided a detailed health history and each underwent comprehensive examinations that included measurements of height and weight and thigh, hip, and waist circumferences, as well as body fat percentage.
They found that people with big thighs had a lower risk of heart disease and premature death than those with thin thighs. In round numbers, a thigh circumference (measured where the thigh meets the butt) of about 62 cm (about 24.4 inches) was most protective; bigger thighs provided little if any extra benefit, but progressively thinner thighs were linked to progressively higher risks.
Thigh size remained a strong independent predictor even after researchers adjusted for risk factors such as smoking, exercise, alcohol use, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and (for women) menopause. The Harvard Men’s Health Watch article notes that this evidence is based on only one study, but its results are impressive. However, since researchers measured thigh size but not thigh composition, they weren’t able to tell if the apparent protection of big thighs is due to more muscle, more fat, or both. But it reminds us that while it’s important to keep overall body fat in check by taking in fewer calories and burning up more calories with exercise, lower body fat (the “pear shape”) is less dangerous than upper body fat (the “apple shape,” or “beer belly”).
Read the full-length article: “Big thighs may be wise”
Also in this issue:
- Kidney stones
- Treating warts
- What to do about a torn meniscus in the knee
The Harvard Men’s Health Watch is available from Harvard Health Publications, the publishing division of Harvard Medical School, for $29 per year. Subscribe at www.health.harvard.edu/mens or by calling 877-649-9457 (toll-free)